4.4 Article

Determination of the Polar Compounds in Vegetable Oil by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry with Chemometrics

期刊

ANALYTICAL LETTERS
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 465-478

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2018.1471608

关键词

Partial least squares discriminant analysis; polar component; principal component analysis; ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry; vegetable oil

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31560478, 31471647]
  2. Key Technologies R & D Program of Jiangxi Province [20161BBF60095, 20152ACF60012]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi [20171ACB21015]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology [SKLF-ZZB-201513]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-throughput ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry was combined with chemometric tools for the rapid determination of polar components in camellia oil, rapeseed oil, and waste cooking oil. The results were analyzed by two unsupervised methods: principal component analysis (one-way ANOVA, p<.05) and volcano plot analysis (p<.05, fold change >= 2) and supervised method: partial least squares discriminant analysis. The results showed that the oils were correctly classified based on their polar components. The first three principal components reflected most detail with a cumulative contribution rate of 84.67% using principal component analysis. The prediction accuracy was close to 100% using partial least squares discriminant analysis. Nineteen components were screened by principal component analysis; twelve were preliminary identified as palmitamide, phytosphingosine, eicosasphinganine, 1-monopalmitin, glyceryl monooleate, glyceryl monostearate, 1 alpha-hydroxyvitamin D2, 1-linoleoyl glycerol, oleamide, sphinganine, stearamide, and linoleic acid. The proposed method may be applied to effectively and accurately authenticate edible oils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据