4.8 Article

Hydrophilic Nanocomposite Functionalized by Carrageenan for the Specific Enrichment of Glycopeptides

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 4047-4054

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05578

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21804041]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [16ZR1407600]
  3. Shanghai Sailing Program [16YF1402400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hydrophilic nanocomposite was synthesized by an easy route to improve glycopeptides enrichment efficiency. This new composite, prepared with a method based on electrostatic interaction, was demonstrated to be efficient for immobilization of carrageenan on graphene oxide/poly(ethylenimine) support (denoted as GO-PEI-Carr). Carrageenan, which has a large number of hydroxyl groups and is fully negatively charged, is a new modified phase of hydrophilic materials in provided the composite not only a perfect surface charge but also a greater ability to enrich glycosylated peptides. Thirty-four glycopeptides from human serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) tryptic digests were obviously observed with greatly improved signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio. A good selectivity was still kept even when the molar ratio of IgG and bovine serum albumin (BSA) tryptic digest mixtures reached to 1:500. Meanwhile, 76 glycopeptides derived from 56 glycoproteins with 83 N-glycosylation sites were identified from human serum and 149 glycopeptides derived from 129 glycoproteins with 157 N-glycosylation sites were identified from mouse liver tissues, which showed the ability to enrich glycopeptides from complex biological samples. In addition, GO-PEI-Carr exhibited a unique repeatability and stability even after enrichment of glycopeptides for 20 times. It also performed a higher sensitivity (1 fmol/mu L IgG), a better enrichment capacity (up to similar to 300mg/g), and an ideal enrichment recovery (90.8% and 109.5%) for glycopeptides enrichment, indicating a great potential for the application of glycoproteomic research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据