4.8 Article

Intracellular Zinc Quantification by Fluorescence Imaging with a FRET System

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 4157-4163

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00018

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21575020, 21727811, 21675019]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N170505002, N170504017, N170507001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluorescence imaging of cellular metals is widely reported. However, the quantification of intracellular metals with fluorescence imaging is so far not feasible and highly challenging. In this work, a ratiometric probe with two fluorescently labeled complementary DNA strains is designed for intracellular zinc quantification via fluorescence imaging, based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from carbon dots (CDs) to fluorescein (FAM). The donor CDs are modified with a Zn2+ aptamer, whereas the receptor FAM is conjugated with the complementary DNA sequence to ensure selectivity. MCF-7 cells are cultured sequentially with Zn2+ (20, 40, 55, 70, 85, and 100 mu mol L-1) and CDs-FAM (100 mu g mL(-1)), which is used for fluorescence imaging (at lambda(ex) = 405 nm and lambda(em) = 440-490 nm for CDs, lambda(em) = 500-550 nm for FAM) to provide a relative fluorescence ratio ((F - F-0)/F-0, F = I-CDs/I-FAM), followed by quantifying intracellular zinc with ICPMS. A linear correlation is achieved between the relative fluorescence ratio in fluorescence images and the intracellular zinc content derived by ICPMS, which facilitates intracellular zinc quantification via fluorescence imaging. It is especially useful for real-time tracing of intracellular zinc during the cell culturing process or in vivo. The cellular uptake of Zn2+ by MCF-7 cells is further evaluated with this approach by culturing with 100 mu mol L-1 of Zn2+ for different times, and a maximum uptake of 60.5 fg per cell is observed at an incubation time of 60 min. This value is further demonstrated well by ICPMS detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据