4.7 Review

MIND not Mediterranean diet related to 12-year incidence of cognitive impairment in an Australian longitudinal cohort study

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 581-589

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.12.011

关键词

MIND diet; Mediterranean diet; Dietary pattern; Mild cognitive impairment; Alzheimer's disease; Cognitive impairment; Longitudinal cohort study

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [229936, 179839, 418039, 1002160]
  2. Australian Research Council [CE110001029]
  3. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship [1102694]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Associations between the Mediterranean-DASH diet Intervention for Neurological Delay (MIND) diet and incidence of cognitive impairment have not been evaluated outside the United States. Methods: We investigated MIND and Mediterranean diet relations with 12-year incidence of Alzheimer's disease/Vascular dementia (National Institute of Neurological Disorders criteria) and mild cognitive impairment (Winbald criteria) in the Personality and Total Health (PATH) Through Life cohort (n = 1220) set in Canberra, Australia: wave-1 2001-2002; wave-2 2005-2006; wave-3 2009-2010; and wave-4 2013-2014. MIND diet and two alternate Mediterranean diet scores were calculated from the baseline food frequency questionnaire responses. Higher dietary scores signified greater adherence. Results: In adjusted logistic regression models, MIND diet (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.24, 0.91), but not Mediterranean diet, was associated with reduced odds of 12-year cognitive impairment. Discussion: Preliminary evidence suggests that protective effects of the MIND diet are geographically generalizable. Additional prospective studies are needed in diverse samples to determine the relative effects of the MIND and the Mediterranean diets against cognitive decline. (C) 2019 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据