4.7 Article

Emerging cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 655-665

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.12.019

关键词

Cerebrospinal fluid; Biomarkers; Dementia; Alzheimer's disease; Autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease; Neuroinflammation

资金

  1. Biogen, Cambridge, MA [SNAP-25, YKL-40, VILIP-1]
  2. Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) - National Institute on Aging (NIA) [U19AG032438]
  3. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE)
  4. Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)
  5. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED
  6. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  7. [K23AG053426]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Four less well-studied but promising emerging cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are elevated in late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD): neurogranin, synaptosomal-associated protein-25 (SNAP-25), visinin-like protein 1 (VILIP-1), and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40). Methods: CSF neurogranin, SNAP-25, VILIP-1, and YKL-40 were measured in families carrying autosomal-dominant AD mutations. Results: The four emerging CSF biomarkers were significantly elevated in the mutation carriers (n5235) versus noncarriers (n5145). CSF SNAP-25, VILIP-1, and YKL-40 were altered very early in the AD time course, approximately 15-19 years before estimated symptom onset. All CSF biomarkers predicted important AD-related outcomes including performance on a cognitive composite, brain amyloid burden as measured by amyloid positron emission tomography, and the estimated years from symptom onset. Discussion: Early abnormalities in CSF tTau, pTau, SNAP-25, VILIP-1, and YKL-40 suggest that synaptic damage, neuronal injury, and neuroinflammation begin shortly after the commencement of brain amyloid accumulation. (C) 2019 the Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据