4.7 Review

Understanding and improving multidisciplinary team working in geriatric medicine

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 498-505

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz021

关键词

high performing teams; comprehensive geriatric assessment; multidisciplinary teams; non-technical skills; patient safety; older people

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  2. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  3. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  4. King's College London
  5. Guy's and St Thomas' Charity
  6. Maudsley Charity
  7. NIHR [12/5003//01]
  8. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  9. the Health Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Geriatric medicine is a speciality that has historically relied on team working to best serve patients. The nature of frailty in older people means that people present with numerous co-morbidities, which in turn require a team-based approach to be managed, including allied health professionals, social work and nursing alongside medicine. The 'engine room' of the speciality has thus for many years been the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting-something other specialities have discovered only recently. Yet, rather paradoxically, the speciality has been slow compared to others (e.g. trauma, surgery, cancer) to reflect more formally on how team working can be enhanced, trained and supported in geriatric teams. This paper is a reflective review, grounded on our respective expertise in geriatric medicine and improvement science, on practice and its changing patterns within geriatric medicine, and the role of MDTs within it (Part 1). It offers a perspective from behavioural safety science, which has been studying team-working in healthcare for the last 20 years (Part 2) and concludes with practical suggestions, based on evidence, on how to integrate evidence and best practice into modern geriatric medicine-to address current and future challenges (Part 3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据