4.8 Article

Improving Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells Using [7]Helicenes with Stable Partial Biradical Characters as the Hole-Extraction Layers

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201808625

关键词

helicene; hole-extraction layer; perovskite; solar cell; stable biradical

资金

  1. Featured Area Research Center Program [108L9006]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOST 106-2218-E-002-021-MY2, 107-3017-F-002-001]
  3. Top University Project from National Taiwan University [107-S-A09, 108L7846]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites have realized a high power conversion efficiency (PCE) in both n-i-p and p-i-n device configurations. However, since the p-i-n structure exempts the sophisticated processing of charge-transporting layers, it seems to possess better potential for practical applications than the n-i-p one. Currently, the inorganic NiOx is the most prevailing hole-transporting layer (HTL) used in p-i-n perovskite solar cells. Nevertheless, defects might exist on its surface to influence the charge transfer/extraction across the interface with perovskite and to affect the quality of the perovskite film grown on it. Herein, two novel [7]helicenes with stable open-shell singlet biradical ground states at room temperature are demonstrated as an effective surface modifier of the NiOx HTL. Their nonpolar feature effectively promotes the crystallinity of the perovskite film grown on them; meanwhile, their unique partial biradical character seems to provide a certain degree of defect passivation function at the perovskite interface to facilitate interfacial charge transfer/extraction. As a result, both 1ab- and 1bb-modifed devices yield a PCE of >18%, exceeding the value (15.6%) of the control device using a sole NiOx HTL, and the maximum PCE can reach 19%. Detailed characterizations are carefully conducted to understand the underlying reasons behind such enhancement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据