4.8 Article

Controlling Ambipolar Charge Transport in Isoindigo-Based Conjugated Polymers by Altering Fluorine Substitution Position for High-Performance Organic Field-Effect Transistors

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201805994

关键词

ambipolar polymer; fluorination; inverter; isoindigo-based polymer; organic field-effect transistor

资金

  1. Center for Advanced Soft Electronics under the Global Frontier Research Program [2012M3A6A5055225, 2013M3A6A5073183]
  2. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes of the National Research Foundation of Korea [2016M1A2A2940912]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016M1A2A2940912] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A molecular design strategy to achieve highly balanced ambipolar charge transport for donor-acceptor (D-A) isoindigo (IIG)-based copolymer through systematic selection of fluorination positions is reported. To study fluorine substitution site effects on electronic and structural properties, two fluorinated IIG-based copolymers (PIIG-iFT2 and PIIG-oFT2) are synthesized, which contain two fluorine atoms at the bithiophene (T2) inner and outer site and compare them with a nonfluorinated copolymer of IIG and T2 (PIIG-T2) as the reference polymer. Fluorination at the outer site of T2 in PIIG-oFT2 polymer effectively lowers molecular energy levels and increases molecular planarity more than fluorination at the T2 inner site. PIIG-oFT2 organic field-effect transistors show highly balanced ambipolar mobility, hole mobility (mu(h))/electron mobility (mu(e)) = 1 by increasing electron mobility, whereas PIIG-T2 (mu(h)/mu(e) = 9.0) and PIIG-iFT2 (mu(h)/mu(e) = 2.4) exhibit unbalanced ambipolar transport. The ambipolar complementary-like inverter is also demonstrated by simple one-time coating of PIIG-oFT2 with gain = 21.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据