4.8 Article

Hierarchical Co3O4 Nanofiber-Carbon Sheet Skeleton with Superior Na/Li-Philic Property Enabling Highly Stable Alkali Metal Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 29, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201808847

关键词

alkali metal anode; Co3O4 nanofiber-carbon sheet composite; lithiophilic 3D skeleton; lithium; sodium dendrite; thermal infusion

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0209600, 2016YFA0202900]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21878268, 21676242]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uncontrollable dendritic behavior and infinite volume expansion in alkali metal anode results in the severe safety hazards and short lifespan for high-energy batteries. Constructing a stable host with superior Na/Li-philic properties is a prerequisite for commercialization. Here, it is demonstrated that the small Gibbs free energy change in the reaction between metal oxide (Co3O4, SnO2, and CuO) and alkali metal is key for metal infusion. The as-prepared hierarchical Co3O4 nanofiber-carbon sheet (CS) skeleton shows improved wettability toward molten Li/Na. The 3D carbon sheet serves as a primary framework, offering adequate lithium nucleation sites and sufficient electrolyte/electrode contact for fast charge transfer. The secondary framework of Co/Li2O nanofibers provides physical confinement of deposited Li and further redistributes the Li+ flux on each carbon fiber, which is verified by COMSOL Multiphysics simulations. Due to the uniform deposition behavior and near-zero volume change, modified symmetrical Li/Li cells can operate under an ultrahigh current density of 20 mA cm(-2) for more than 120 cycles. When paired with LiFePO4 cathodes, the Li/Co-CS cell shows low polarization and 88.4% capacity retention after 200 cycles under 2 C. Convincing improvement can also be observed in Na/Co-CS symmetrical cells applying NaClO4-based electrolyte. These results illustrate a significant improvement in developing safe and stable alkali metal batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据