4.7 Review

Leveraging the interplay of nanotechnology and neuroscience: Designing new avenues for treating central nervous system disorders

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 181-203

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.02.009

关键词

Nanomedicine; Translational medicine; Central nervous system; Neuroinflammation; Neurodegeneration; Psychiatric disorders; Glioblastoma; Nerve repair; Theranostics

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [U01NS103882, RO1NS093416]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanotechnology has the potential to open many novel diagnostic and treatment avenues for disorders of the central nervous system (CNS). In this review, we discuss recent developments in the applications of nanotechnology in CNS therapies, diagnosis and biology. Novel approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroinflammation, brain dysfunction, psychiatric conditions, brain cancer, and nerve injury provide insights into the potential of nanomedicine. We also highlight nanotechnology-enabled neuroscience techniques such as electrophysiology and intracellular sampling to improve our understanding of the brain and its components. With nanotechnology integrally involved in the advancement of basic neuroscience and the development of novel treatments, combined diagnostic and therapeutic applications have begun to emerge. Nanotheranostics for the brain, able to achieve single-cell resolution, will hasten the rate in which we can diagnose, monitor, and treat diseases. Taken together, the recent advances highlighted in this review demonstrate the prospect for significant improvements to clinical diagnosis and treatment of a vast array of neurological diseases. However, it is apparent that a strong dialogue between the nanoscience and neuroscience communities will be critical for the development of successful nanotherapeutics that move to the clinic, benefit patients, and address unmet needs in CNS disorders. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据