4.6 Article

Are long-term vapers interested in vaping cessation support?

期刊

ADDICTION
卷 114, 期 8, 页码 1473-1477

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/add.14595

关键词

E-cigarette; electronic cigarette; electronic nicotine delivery devices (ENDS); nicotine; smoking; tobacco use disorder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims We investigated whether long-term vapers were interested in vaping cessation support. Design, Setting and Participants Online survey in 2017 of long-term vapers (n = 347), mainly in France, Switzerland and Belgium, enrolled through e-cigarette and smoking cessation websites. Measurements Opinions on potential vaping cessation services. Findings Participants had been vaping for 4 years on average (standard deviation 1 year), most were daily vapers (96%, n = 333), former smokers (88%, n = 303), vaped nicotine-containing liquids (88%, n = 305), reported being dependent on e-cigarettes (89%, n = 308) and had no intention to stop vaping (66%, n = 229). Few (10%, n = 34) had already tried to stop vaping. Among those (n = 118, 34% of 347) who intended to stop vaping, 27% (n = 32) thought that a health professional could help them stop vaping, 33% (n = 39) would visit a vaping cessation service if available in their neighbourhood, 23% (n = 27) would use nicotine medications to stop vaping, and if a vaping cessation website or smartphone app. were available, 46% (n = 54) would use them. In open-ended comments (n = 94), participants reported that they did not see why they should stop vaping (n = 37), in particular because vaping helped them quit smoking (n = 17) and was less toxic than smoking (n = 9), that smoking cessation aids had not worked for them and neither would similar aids help them stop vaping (n = 6), and that they would stop vaping by gradually decreasing the nicotine content in their e-liquids (n = 12). Conclusions Most long-term vapers in this 2017 European online survey had no intention of stopping vaping, but one-quarter to one-half of those who intended to stop were interested in using vaping cessation support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据