4.5 Article

Cyclic loading-unloading creep behavior of composite layered specimens

期刊

ACTA GEOPHYSICA
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 449-464

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11600-019-00261-x

关键词

Rock-like material; Anisotropy; Creep tests; Visco-elasto-plastic deformation; Creep failure

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015XKZD05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soft and hard interbedded rocks show obvious time-dependent deformation after deep tunnel excavations, and it is therefore necessary to research the mechanical behavior of the layered rock. However, it is hard to obtain ideal transversely isotropic rocks in fields, so rock-like specimens were poured by using artificial materials. Cyclic loading-unloading creep experiments were performed on the artificial layered cemented specimens with various layer angles (0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees) at a 20MPa confinement. Time-independent deformations and time-dependent deformations of the rock-like specimens were distinguished to investigate the visco-elasto-plastic deformation characteristics. Instantaneous elastic strain and instantaneous plastic strain had linear correlations with stress ratio, whereas creep strain, including visco-elastic strain and visco-plastic strain, increased nonlinearly with an increasing stress ratio. The specimens with a small layer angle had more noticeable time-independent and time-dependent deformations and larger steady-state creep rates than those of the specimens with a large layer angle. Attenuation creep and secondary creep could be observed at relative low stress levels, whereas accelerating creep until failure occurred at the creep failure stress level. The time for creep failure can be predicated according to the axial steady-state creep rate or volumetric creep curve. Damage in the rock-like specimens showed linear correlation with the stress ratio. Dip angle has a significant effect on the creep failure mode under cyclic loading-unloading conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据