4.8 Article

Dexamethasone Conjugation to Biodegradable Avidin-Nucleic-Acid-Nano-Assemblies Promotes Selective Liver Targeting and Improves Therapeutic Efficacy in an Autoimmune Hepatitis Murine Model

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 4410-4423

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b09655

关键词

avidin-nucleic-acid-nano-assemblies; autoimmune hepatitis; steroid treatment; targeted drug release; pH reversible linker

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [RF-2013-02356221, cc-2015-2365332, 43/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steroids are the standard therapy for auto immune hepatitis (AIH) but the long-lasting administration is hampered by severe side effects. Methods to improve the tropism of the drug toward the liver are therefore required. Among them, conjugation to nano particles represents one possible strategy. In this study, we exploited the natural liver tropism of Avidin-Nucleic-Acid-Nano-Assemblies (ANANAS) to carry dexamethasone selectively to the liver in an AIH animal model. An acid labile biotin-hydrazone linker was developed for reversible dexamethasone loading onto ANANAS. The biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of free and ANANAS-linked dexamethasone (ANANAS-Hz-Dex) in healthy and AIH mice were investigated upon intraperitoneal administration. In ANANAS-treated animals, the free drug was detected only in the liver. Super-resolution microscopy showed that nanoparticles segregate inside lysosomes of liver immunocompetent cells, mainly involved in AIH progression. In agreement with these observational results, chronic low-dose treatment with ANANAS-Hz-Dex reduced the expression of liver inflammation markers and, in contrast to the free drug, also the levels of circulating AIH-specific autoantibodies. These data suggest that the ANANAS carrier attenuates AIH-related liver damage without drug accumulation in off-site tissues. The safety and biodegradability of the ANANAS carrier make this formulation a promising tool for the treatment of autoimmune liver disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据