4.8 Article

Acrylic Acid-Functionalized Metal-Organic Frameworks for Sc(III) Selective Adsorption

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 11772-11781

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b00476

关键词

Sc(III); metal-organic frameworks; acrylic acid; adsorption; selectivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21201094, 21171080, 51674131]
  2. Scientific Research Found of Liaoning Provincial Education Department [L2014004]
  3. Program for Liaoning Excellent Talents in University [LR2015026]
  4. Liaoning Provincial Department of Education Innovation Team Projects [LT2015012]
  5. National Science Technology Ministry [2015BAB02B03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing demand for rare-earth elements (REEs) due to their extensive high-tech applications has encouraged the development of new sustainable approaches for REE recovery and separation. In this work, a series of acrylic acid-functionalized metal-organic framework materials (named as y-AA-x@MIL-101s) were prepared and used for selective adsorption of Sc(III). The adsorbent was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, nitrogen adsorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and zeta potential and surface functional-group titration. The adsorption isotherm and kinetics data were accurately described by the Langmuir and pseudo-second-order models. The adsorption capacity of the material for Sc(III), Gd(III), and Er(III) was 90.21, 104.59, 58.29, and 74.94 mg(-1) respectively. Importantly, the adsorbent was better for selective recovery of Sc(III) not only from the 16 REE mixed system but also the Cu(II), Zn(II), Co(II), and Al(III) coexistence solution. Except for Sc(III), the material displayed high affinity for Nd(III) in the light rare-earth mixture and for Gd(III) in the middle rare-earth mixture. All in all, this study provides a new method for separation and recovery of REEs, which makes this work highly significant in separation and enrichment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据