4.8 Article

Direct Evidence of Ion-Migration-Induced Degradation of Ultrabright Perovskite Light-Emitting Diodes

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 11667-11673

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b22217

关键词

perovskite light-emitting diodes; sequential deposition; degradation; ion migration; electrode peel-off

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2016R1A2B3009301]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A2B3009301] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low operational lifetime is a critical issue in perovskite light-emitting diodes. The forward-bias currents for light emission accelerate device degradation, which needs to be identified and understood to be able to improve the device stability. Here, we systematically analyze the degradation mechanism of perovskite light emitting diodes (PeLEDs) fabricated with a sequential deposition method that produce a compact and pinhole-free perovskite film. The device exhibits an efficient green electroluminescence (peak wavelength at 533 nm and full width at half-maximum of 22 nm) with a maximum luminance of more than 67 000 cd/m(2). The lifetime, however, is quite short; under the constant current bias for an initial luminance of 1000 cd/m(2), the decay time to reach half of the initial luminance is approximately 13 min. Dark spots are created and enlarged as a result of perovskite film deterioration and ion migration. By investigating morphological changes in the perovskite films and the amount of ion accumulation under the Al electrode for the unoperated, T-50 (luminance decay to 50% of the initial value), and T-10 (luminance decay to 10% of the initial value) devices, we propose a degradation mechanism for PeLEDs. The ion migration from the perovskite layer experienced electrochemical interactions with the Al electrode, causing device degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据