4.2 Article

Gene and cell-based therapies for inherited retinal disorders: An update

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31534

关键词

retinal degeneration; gene therapy; stem cells; iPSCs; CRISPR; leber congenital amaurosis; choroideremia; retinitis pigmentosa; Usher syndrome; retinoschisis; leber hereditary optic neuropathy; achromatopsia

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [5P30EY019007, R01EY018213, R01EY024698, R01EY026682, R21AG050437]
  2. National Cancer Institute Core [5P30CA013696]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB) Physician-Scientist Award
  4. RPB, New York, NY, USA
  5. RPB medical student fellowship
  6. International Council of Ophthalmology-Retina Research Foundation Helmerich Fellowship
  7. Tistou and Charlotte Kerstan Foundation
  8. Schneeweiss Stem Cell Fund, New York State [C029572]
  9. Foundation Fighting Blindness New York Regional Research Center Grant [C-NY05-0705-0312]
  10. Joel Hoffman Fund
  11. Professor Gertrude Rothschild Stem Cell Foundation
  12. Gebroe Family Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinal degenerations present a unique challenge as disease progression is irreversible and the retina has little regenerative potential. No current treatments for inherited retinal disease have the ability to reverse blindness, and current dietary supplement recommendations only delay disease progression with varied results. However, the retina is anatomically accessible and capable of being monitored at high resolution in vivo. This, in addition to the immune-privileged status of the eye, has put ocular disease at the forefront of advances in gene- and cell-based therapies. This review provides an update on gene therapies and randomized control trials for inherited retinal disease, including Leber congenital amaurosis, choroideremia, retinitis pigmentosa, Usher syndrome, X-linked retinoschisis, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, and achromatopsia. New gene-modifying and cell-based strategies are also discussed. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据