4.8 Article

In Situ Synthesis of a Sandwich-like Graphene@ZIF-67 Heterostructure for Highly Sensitive Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing in Human Serums

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 9374-9384

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b22478

关键词

in situ synthesis; sandwich-like nanostructure; ZIF-67; graphene nanosheets; nonenzymatic glucose sensing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21804031, 81771718, 81672919]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been extensively studied in recent years due to their tunable porosity, huge specific area, and controllable structure. The rich metal centers and large specific area have endowed MOFs with excellent electrochemical activity due to the multiple valence states, but the poor electronic conductivity of MOFs seriously impedes their electrocatalytic performance. Here, a polyhedral Co-based zeolite imidazole frame [Co(mim)(2)](n) (denoted as ZIF-67, mim = 2-methylimidazole) is in situ loaded on the two sides of physically exfoliated graphene nanosheets (GSs) at room temperature, and sandwich-like GS@ZIF-67 hybrids with an ordered nanostructure are easily obtained. Compared with each individual component, the as-synthesized GS@ZIF-67 hybrids exhibit higher electrochemical activity toward glucose oxidation. Besides, the hierarchical nanocomposites also show better electrocatalytic performance compared with the same ratio of a physical mixture of GSs and ZIF-67, further demonstrating the synergistic effect between ZIF-67 and GSs. Thus, a highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose electrochemical sensor is proposed with a linear range of 1-805.5 mu M, sensitivity of 1521.1 mu A Mm(-1) cm(-2), detection limit of 0.36 mu M (S/N = 3), and excellent stability and selectivity. More importantly, the newly fabricated sensor is also successfully applied for glucose determination in human serums with satisfactory results, suggesting its promising potential toward glucose detection in real samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据