4.8 Article

Reversibly Assembled Electroconductive Hydrogel via a Host-Guest Interaction for 3D Cell Culture

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 7715-7724

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b19482

关键词

host-guest; self-assembly; PEDOT; electroconductive hydrogel; 3D cell culture

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03Z2EN12, 03Z2E511]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of cells responding to an electroconductive environment is impeded by the lack of a method, which would allow the encapsulation of cells in an extracellular matrix-like 3D electroactive matrix, and more challengingly, permit a simple mechanism to release cells for further characterization. Herein, we report a polysaccharide based conductive hydrogel system formed via a beta-cyclodextrin-adamantane host guest interaction. Oxidative polymerization of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) in the presence of adamantyl-modified sulfated alginate (S-Alg-Ad) results in bio-electroconductive polymer PEDOT:S-Alg-Ad, which can form hydrogel with poly-beta-cyclodextrin (P beta-CD). The PEDOT:S-Alg-Ad/P beta-CD hydrogels can be tuned on aspects of mechanical and electrical properties, exhibit self-healing feature, and are injectable. Electron microscopy suggested that the difference in stiffness and conductivity is associated with the nacre-like layered nanostructures when different sizes of PEDOT:S-Alg-Ad nanoparticles were used. Myoblast C2C12 cells were encapsulated in the conductive hydrogel and exhibited proliferation rate comparable to that in nonconductive S-Alg-Ad/P beta-CD hydrogel. The cells could be released from the hydrogels by adding the beta-CD monomer. Astonishingly, the conductive hydrogel can dramatically promote myotube-like structure formation, which is not in the non-electroconductive hydrogel. The ability to embed and release cells in an electroconductive environment will open new doors for cell culture and tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据