4.8 Article

High-Performance Photodetectors Based on Lead-Free 2D Ruddlesden-Popper Perovskite/MoS2 Heterostructures

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 8419-8427

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b20538

关键词

2D perovskite; lead-free; transition metal dichalcogenide; graphene; heterostructure; photodetector

资金

  1. NSFC [61674060]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, HUST [2017KFYXJJ030, 2017KFXKJC002, 2017KFXKJC003, 2018KFYXKJC016]
  3. New Mexico EPSCoR [NSF-1301346]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites have attracted great interest for their promising applications in high-performance optoelectronic devices owing to their greatly tunable band gaps, layered characteristics, and better environmental stability over three-dimensional (3D) perovskites. Here, we for the first time report on photodetectors based on few-layer MoS2 (n-type) and lead-free 2D perovskite (PEA)(2)SnI4 (p-type) heterostructures. The heterojunction device is capable of sensing light over the entire visible and near-infrared wavelength range with a tunable photoresponse peak. By using few-layer graphene flakes as the electrical contact, the performance of the heterostructures can be improved with a responsivity of 1100 A/W at 3 V bias, a fast response speed of similar to 40 ms under zero bias, and an excellent rectification ratio of 500. Importantly, the quantum efficiency can achieve 38.2% at zero bias, which is comparable or even higher than that of 3D perovskite/2D material photodetectors. Importantly, the spectral response peak of heterojunctions gradually shifts in a wide spectral range from the band edge of MoS2 toward that of (PEA)(2)SnI4 with the external bias. We believe these 2D perovskite/2D material heterostructures with a great diversity represent an interesting system for investigating the fundamental optoelectronic properties and open up a new pathway toward 2D perovskite-based optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据