4.2 Article

Kabuki Syndrome as a Cause of Non-Immune Fetal Hydrops/Ascites

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
卷 170, 期 12, 页码 3333-3337

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37956

关键词

Kabuki; fetal ascites; hydrops; prenatal; KMT2D; KDM6A

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kabuki syndrome (MIM 147920) is a well-described, multiple congenital anomaly syndrome characterized by growth and developmental delay, cardiac, renal, and vertebral anomalies, as well as persistent fetal finger pads and distinct facial features. Facies are characterized by long palpebral fissures with eversion of lateral third of the lower eyelid, resembling the Kabuki makeup theatre genre after which the syndrome is named. Kabuki syndrome is estimated to affect 1/32,000 births, with 55-80% of patients showing nonsense or frameshift mutations in the KMT2D(MLL2) gene, which encodes a histone transferase located on chromosome 12q. Additionally, owing to the heterogeneous nature of Kabuki syndrome, a smaller number of diagnosed patients have been identified with mutations or deletions in KDM6A (a component of the same transcriptional complex as KMT2D) with no mutations in KMT2D, or as those diagnosed with Kabuki syndrome and without alterations in either KMT2D or KDM6A. Diagnosis of the syndrome in newborns and infants is difficult, as the facial features are not as evident as in toddler-or childhood. There are no known tell-tale signs of Kabuki syndrome prenatally, and there are no reports of common, specific findings in fetuses that might suggest the diagnosis. We present here two infants who presented with prenatal hydrops/ascites, who were subsequently diagnosed with Kabuki syndrome. Although relatively non-specific, we suggest that Kabuki syndrome be added to the list of genetic syndromes that are suspected in cases of prenatal hydrops, review the molecular etiology of Kabuki syndrome, and broaden the phenotype of this well-described disorder. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据