4.5 Article

Extra length of stay and costs because of health care-associated infections at a German university hospital

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 160-166

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.09.005

关键词

Cost; Health care-associated infection; Hospital; Inpatients; Length of stay

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01-E0-1002]
  2. Bruce J Anderson Foundation
  3. McLean Private Donors Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Health care-associated infections (HAIs) can be associated with increased health care costs. We examined extra length of hospital stay (LOS) and associated per diem costs attributable to HAIs in a large academic medical center. Methods: Data for analysis were acquired in a preinterventional phase of a prospective cohort study (ALERTS) conducted over 12 months in 27 general and 4 intensive care units at Jena University Hospital. HAIs were identified among patients hospitalized for >48 hours with at least 1 risk factor for HAI and new antimicrobial therapy; the diagnosis was confirmed by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Extra LOS was estimated by multistate modeling, and associated extra costs were based on average per diem costs for clinical units sampled. Results: Of a total of 22,613 patients hospitalized for >= 48 hours, 893 (3.95%) experienced 1,212 episodes of HAI during 12 months. The associated mean extra LOS +/- SEM in general units was 8.45 +/- 0.80 days per case and 8.09 +/- 0.91 days for patients treated in both general and intensive care units. Additional costs attributable to HAIs were (sic)5,823-(sic)11,840 ($7,453-$15,155) per infected patient. Conclusion: HAIs generated substantial extra costs by prolonging hospitalization. Potential clinical and financial savings may be realized by implementing effective infection prevention programs. Copyright (c) 2016 by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据