4.6 Article

Impact of sarcopenia on treatment tolerance in United States veterans with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 91, 期 10, 页码 1002-1007

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24465

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCCN
  2. Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation
  3. American Cancer Society [MSRG-13-077-01-CPHPS]
  4. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health [U54CA155496, 5K12HL087107]
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR000448, TL1TR000449]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While sarcopenia has been associated with decreased overall survival in diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) patients, the impact of sarcopenia on treatment tolerance has not been well-studied. We evaluated the association of sarcopenia with febrile neutropenia hospitalization, treatment-related mortality, and ability to complete standard number of cycles in a retrospective cohort of United States veterans diagnosed with DLBCL between 1998 and 2008 and treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, with or without rituximab. Baseline body composition parameters were evaluated using computed tomography analysis. In total, 522 patients were included in the study, of whom 245 (47%) had baseline sarcopenia. After controlling for other variables, baseline sarcopenia was independently associated with increased risk of febrile neutropenia hospitalization (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.65) and inability to complete standard number of treatment cycles (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.02-2.16) compared with no baseline sarcopenia. There was a non-statistically significant trend toward higher treatment-related mortality in sarcopenic patients than non-sarcopenic patients (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 0.92-3.41). Sarcopenia is associated with increased risk of treatment intolerance and may be useful in guiding treatment planning and supportive care measures. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据