4.4 Article

Comparison of Length of Stay, 30-Day Mortality, and 30-Day Readmission Rates in Medicare Patients With Heart Failure and With Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 118, 期 1, 页码 79-85

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Bethesda, Maryland) [5T32HL00745734]
  2. Amgen, Inc. (Thousand Oaks, California)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rates have not been compared between Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and beneficiaries with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), although HFpEF is common in patients with HF. To determine whether type of HF (HFrEF or HFpEF) was associated with LOS, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission, we used a cohort of 19,477 Medieare beneficiaries admitted to the hospital and discharged alive with a primary discharge diagnosis of HF between 2007 and 2011. Gamma regression, Poisson regression, and Cox proportional hazards with a competing risk for death were used to model LOS, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rate, respectively. All models were adjusted for HF severity, co-morbidities, demographics, nursing home residence, and calendar year of admission. Beneficiaries with HFpEF had an LOS 0.02 days shorter than beneficiaries with HFrEF and a nearly identical 30-day readmission rate. Thirty-day mortality was 10% lower in beneficiaries with HFpEF versus HFrEF. In conclusion, readmission rates were as high in those with HFpEF as they are in those with HFrEF, with comparable LOS in the hospital. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2016;118:79-85)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据