4.6 Article

When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration

期刊

AMBIO
卷 45, 期 5, 页码 538-550

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0772-y

关键词

Deforestation; Forest assessment; Forest management; Landscape; Plantation; Reforestation; Restoration

资金

  1. U.S. NSF Coupled Human and Natural Systems Program [DEB-1313788]
  2. 'Improving the way knowledge on forests is understood and used internationally (KNOW-FOR)' program from IUCN
  3. Department for International Development (DFID)
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1313788] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a historical overview of forest concepts and definitions, linking these changes with distinct perspectives and management objectives. Policies dealing with a broad range of forest issues are often based on definitions created for the purpose of assessing global forest stocks, which do not distinguish between natural and planted forests or reforests, and which have not proved useful in assessing national and global rates of forest regrowth and restoration. Implementing and monitoring forest and landscape restoration requires additional approaches to defining and assessing forests that reveal the qualities and trajectories of forest patches in a spatially and temporally dynamic landscape matrix. New technologies and participatory assessment of forest states and trajectories offer the potential to operationalize such definitions. Purpose-built and contextualized definitions are needed to support policies that successfully protect, sustain, and regrow forests at national and global scales. We provide a framework to illustrate how different management objectives drive the relative importance of different aspects of forest state, dynamics, and landscape context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据