4.1 Article

Pulse Pressure Is Associated With Early Brain Atrophy and Cognitive Decline: Modifying Effects of APOE-ε4

期刊

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 210-215

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000127

关键词

pulse pressure; cognition; APOE; Alzheimer disease

资金

  1. Framingham Heart Study's National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC-25195]
  2. National Institute on Aging [R01-AG16495, R01-AG08122]
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01-NS17950]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated whether midlife pulse pressure is associated with brain atrophy and cognitive decline, and whether the association was modified by apolipoprotein-E epsilon 4 (APOE-epsilon 4) and hypertension. Participants (549 stroke-free and dementia-free Framingham Offspring Cohort Study participants, age range=55.0 to 64.9 y) underwent baseline neuropsychological and magnetic resonance imaging (subset, n=454) evaluations with 5- to 7-year follow-up. Regression analyses investigated associations between baseline pulse pressure (systolic-diastolic pressure) and cognition, total cerebral volume and temporal horn ventricular volume (as an index of smaller hippocampal volume) at follow-up, and longitudinal change in these measures. Interactions with APOE-epsilon 4 and hypertension were assessed. Covariates included age, sex, education, assessment interval, and interim stroke. In the total sample, baseline pulse pressure was associated with worse executive ability, lower total cerebral volume, and greater temporal horn ventricular volume 5 to 7 years later, and longitudinal decline in executive ability and increase in temporal horn ventricular volume. Among APOE-epsilon 4 carriers only, baseline pulse pressure was associated with longitudinal decline in visuospatial organization. Findings indicate arterial stiffening, indexed by pulse pressure, may play a role in early cognitive decline and brain atrophy in mid to late life, particularly among APOE-epsilon 4 carriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据