4.4 Article

Diabetic polyneuropathy and the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy: a nationwide, population-based study

期刊

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
卷 93, 期 8, 页码 713-718

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aos.12746

关键词

diabetic polyneuropathy; diabetic retinopathy; population-based studies

资金

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence [MOHW104-TDU-B-212-113002]
  2. China Medical University Hospital
  3. Academia Sinica Taiwan Biobank Stroke Biosignature Project [BM104010092]
  4. NRPB Stroke Clinical Trial Consortium [MOST 103-2325-B-039 -006]
  5. Tseng-Lien Lin Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan
  6. Taiwan Brain DiseaseFoundation, Taipei, Taiwan
  7. Katsuzo and Kiyo AoshimaMemorial Funds, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To assess the relationship between diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: From 1997 to 2010, we identified 5031 newly diagnosed DPN patients and 20 124 controls matched for sex, age, and index year. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of DR between the DPN patients and the non-DPN group. The adjusted hazard ratio was calculated and adjusted for age, sex, duration of diabetes and comorbidities of hypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetic nephropathy. Results: The incidence rate of DR was 5.87-fold higher in the DPN patients than in the non-DPN group (44.0 vs. 7.22 per 1000 person-years), with an adjusted HR of 5.41(95% CI = 4.92-5.94). The DPN-to-non-DPN DR incidence rate ratio decreased with age (adjusted HR = 6.63 for subgroup younger than 65 years and adjusted HR = 3.91 for subgroup aged 65 years or older). Compared with the non-DPN group, the DPN patients had a 5.63-fold risk of non-proliferative DR (adjusted HR = 5.63, 95% CI = 5.11-6.21) and a 3.67-fold risk of proliferative DR (adjusted HR = 3.67, 95% CI = 2.57-5.23). Conclusion: The patients with DPN had an increased risk of developing DR and advanced DR compared with the non-DPN group, particularly among the subgroup aged younger than 65 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据