Allergy testing in children with persistent asthma: comparison of four diagnostic methods

BackgroundMultiple allergic sensitizations are common in persistent childhood asthma, and thorough assessment of allergy is crucial for optimal care of these children. Microarray testing offers opportunities for improved sIgE characterization, which has been projected to be useful in the management of multisensitized patients. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and information obtained by two microarray platforms applied on a well-characterized pediatric asthma cohort. MethodsSeventy-one children were recruited from a nationwide Swedish study on severe childhood asthma. Severe (n = 40) and controlled (n = 31) asthmatics were assessed for allergic sensitization by two microarray systems (Microtest and ISAC) and by two standard diagnostic methods (ImmunoCAP and skin prick test). Data on clinical history, physical examination, spirometry, asthma control test, and doctor's diagnosis were collected. Results from the four diagnostic methods were analyzed and compared. ResultsA high prevalence of allergic sensitization was observed in this cohort. The pairwise concordance between two methods was 90-92% independently of methods compared. The sensitivity of the four methods against doctor's diagnosis was 0.77-0.88, and the specificity was 0.97-0.99. Microarray methods provided new information in 47% of the sensitized children in comparison with results obtained by standard diagnostic methods. ConclusionThe high prevalence of food and respiratory sensitization supports the clinical guideline recommendation that allergies should be evaluated in all children with suspected asthma. The microarray platforms studied here demonstrated acceptable accuracy and provided refined IgE characterization in 47% of the patients compared to standard extract-based methods.