4.6 Article

Proteome analysis identifies L1CAM/CD171 and DPP4/CD26 as novel markers of human skin mast cells

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 85-97

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/all.12919

关键词

bone marrow; mastocytosis; proteomics; psoriasis; skin homeostasis

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [T545-B19, F4704-B20]
  2. CE.R.I.E.S, Neuilly, France
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [T545] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [T 545] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe function of skin mast cells has been well documented in IgE-mediated allergic reactions, whereas other mast cell functions are poorly defined. This study aimed at identifying novel mast cell proteins by proteome analysis of primary human skin mast cells. MethodsThe proteome of skin mast cells was compared to other cell types and analyzed using bioinformatics. The expression and function of two proteins hitherto not described in skin mast cells was investigated in isolated mast cells as well as in mast cells in situ. ResultsWithin the mast cell proteome, we identified 49 highly expressed proteins previously not described in mast cells; 21 of these proteins were found to be selectively expressed in mast cells. Two proteins, the neural cell adhesion molecule L1 and dipeptidyl peptidase 4, were further studied. L1 was found to be highly expressed in mast cells in normal, psoriasis, and mastocytosis skin. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 was found to be expressed in mast cells in normal, psoriasis, and mastocytosis skin as well as in bone marrow mast cells in patients with systemic mastocytosis. In normal skin, mast cells were identified as a major source of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 and we also found that skin mast cells and fibroblasts secrete an active form of this enzyme. ConclusionsIn a systematic proteomics approach we identified two novel mast cell proteins potentially relevant to skin homeostasis: neural cell adhesion molecule L1 and dipeptidyl peptidase 4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据