4.7 Article

The features of mucosa-associated microbiota in primary sclerosing cholangitis

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 790-801

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.13552

关键词

-

资金

  1. Falk
  2. Abbvie
  3. Joel Pekow
  4. NIH
  5. American Cancer Society
  6. Takeda
  7. Abvie
  8. Exact Sciences Corporation
  9. National Institute of Health [NIDDK 1K01DK094986-01]
  10. Chemotherapy Foundation
  11. Helmsley Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundLittle is known about the role of the microbiome in primary sclerosing cholangitis. AimTo explore the mucosa-associated microbiota in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients across different locations in the gut, and to compare it with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-only patients and healthy controls. MethodsBiopsies from the terminal ileum, right colon, and left colon were collected from patients and healthy controls undergoing colonoscopy. Microbiota profiling using bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing was performed on all biopsies. ResultsForty-four patients were recruited: 20 with PSC (19 with PSC-IBD and one with PSC-only), 15 with IBD-only and nine healthy controls. The overall microbiome profile was similar throughout different locations in the gut. No differences in the global microbiome profile were found. However, we observed significant PSC-associated enrichment in Barnesiellaceae at the family level, and in Blautia and an unidentified Barnesiellaceae at the genus level. At the operational taxa unit level, most shifts in PSC were observed in Clostridiales and Bacteroidales orders, with approximately 86% of shifts occurring within the former order. ConclusionsThe overall microbiota profile was similar across multiple locations in the gut from the same individual regardless of disease status. In this study, the mucosa associated-microbiota of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis was characterised by enrichment of Blautia and Barnesiellaceae and by major shifts in operational taxa units within Clostridiales order.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据