4.5 Article

Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Organic Wheat Production: Crop Yield and Nitrate Leaching

期刊

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
卷 108, 期 2, 页码 770-781

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2015.0464

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. MiPAAF, Ministero Italiano delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen fertility management represents a crucial aspect for common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production, particularly when we deal with organic agriculture. This study was conducted to determine the effect of five N fertilization strategies on yield, grain protein content, and N leaching risk. In a 3-yr field experiment, a faba bean/wheat temporary intercropping (TIC) and four fertilization treatments with extra-farm N sources were compared. Extra-farm N sources were represented by blood meal (BM) and roasted leather (RL) (broadcast all-at-once at seeding or split into one-half at seeding and one-half at tillering in a side-dressing application). Unfertilized and mineral fertilized controls were included. The effect of the legume on TIC wheat N uptake was always positive while dry weight accumulation and yield were generally poorly affected. Regardless of the broadcasting method, BM treatments generally showed a slightly higher yield and grain protein content compared to wheat fertilized with roasted leather (this was also confirmed by fertilizer release efficiency). The risk of N leaching was maximum at the onset of drainage (i.e., during the first phase of crop growth), so using organic fertilizers at pre-seeding stage appeared to be a very risky practice, especially if quick-N-releasing ones are used. Splitting the organic fertilizer rate avoided a large amount of mineralized N to be leached in the watershed during the critical stage of drainage onset. The TIC was the best option in terms of environmental preservation, and assured a constantly higher grain protein content compared to the other organic fertilization treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据