4.4 Article

Optimal management of Cistus ladanifer shrublands for biomass and Boletus edulis mushroom production

期刊

AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS
卷 91, 期 4, 页码 663-676

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-016-9994-z

关键词

Rockroses; Boletus edulis; Biomass; Optimal rotation; Dynamic programming

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain [AGL2012-40035-C03-02, AGL2011-2585]
  2. Junta de Castilla y Leon [VA206U13]
  3. Zamora Territorial Service of the Development and Environment Department (Junta de Castilla y Leon)
  4. FPI-UVa Grant of University of Valladolid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Shrubland management has not traditionally been considered in forest planning. However, some of these forest systems can provide economic benefits due to both the use of biomass and the high production of marketable edible fungi associated with the shrub species. This is the case for Cistus ladanifer, a species widely distributed in the Mediterranean region, which produces high yields of the greatly appreciated mushroom Boletus edulis. The main objective of this study is to estimate the optimal cycle that should be adopted for the management of Mediterranean shrublands dominated by C. ladanifer in considering two outputs: C. ladanifer biomass and B. edulis production, and choosing the alternative with the highest associated monetary returns. Two different scenarios have been developed: a static scenario in which the optimal rotation of C. ladanifer shrubland considering five prescriptions including different management operations has been calculated; and a dynamic analysis, in which different management operations could be practiced over the next 25 years. Both scenarios consider biomass and mushroom picking as outputs. The results of these analyses show that the most appropriate management option is to perform a total clearing close to the end of that time interval. The results could be used to justify sound management practices in these forest systems where fungal harvesting focused on B. edulis could provide significant incomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据