4.7 Article

Bioenergy cropping systems that incorporate native grasses stimulate growth of plant\-associated soil microbes in the absence of nitrogen fertilization

期刊

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
卷 233, 期 -, 页码 396-403

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.008

关键词

AM fungi; Gram-negative bacteria; Cellulosic biomass; Phospholipid fatty acid; Perennial agroecosystems; Plant-microbe interactions

资金

  1. DOE-Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science) [DE-FC02-07ER64494]
  2. DOE OBP Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The choice of crops and their management can strongly influence soil microbial communities and their processes. We used lipid biomarker profiling to characterize how soil microbial composition of five potential bioenergy cropping systems diverged from a common baseline five years after they were established. The cropping systems we studied included an annual system (continuous no-till corn) and four perennial crops (switchgrass, miscanthus, hybrid poplar, and restored prairie). Partial- and no-stover removal were compared for the corn system, while N-additions were compared to unfertilized plots for the perennial cropping systems. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and Gram-negative biomass was higher in unfertilized perennial grass systems, especially in switchgrass and prairie. Gram-positive bacterial biomass decreased in all systems relative to baseline values in surface soils (0-10 cm), but not subsurface soils (10-25 cm). Overall microbial composition was similar between the two soil depths. Our findings demonstrate the capacity of unfertilized perennial cropping systems to recreate microbial composition found in undisturbed soil environments and indicate how strongly agroecosystem management decisions such as N addition and plant community composition can influence soil microbial assemblages. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据