4.6 Article

Ischemic stroke patients are biologically older than their chronological age

期刊

AGING-US
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 2655-2666

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.101028

关键词

Ischemic stroke; aging; epigenetics; biological age; DNA methylation

资金

  1. Agencia de Gestio Ajuts Universitaris de Recerca [2014 SGR 1213]
  2. Spain's Ministry of Health (Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo) through the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII-FIS-FEDER-ERDF) [PI12/01238, PI15/00451, PI15/00445]
  3. Red de Investigacion Cardiovascular, Institute de Salud Carlos III RETIC [RD12/0042/0020, RD12/0042/0013]
  4. RecerCaixa research grant [JJ086116]
  5. iPFIS contract from Instituto de Salud Carlos III [IF114/00007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ischemic stroke is associated with aging. It is possible to predict chronological age by measuring age-related changes in DNA methylation from multiple CpG sites across the genome, known as biological age. The difference between biological age and actual chronological age would indicate an individual's level of aging. Our aim was to determine the biological age of ischemic stroke patients and compare their aging with controls of the same chronological age. A total of 123 individuals, 41 controls and 82 patients with ischemic stroke were paired by chronological age, ranging from 39 to 82 years. Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array was used to measure DNA methylation in CpG sites in both groups, and biological age was estimated using methylation values of specific CpGs. Ischemic stroke patients were biologically an average 2.5 years older than healthy controls (p-value=0.010). Stratified by age tertiles, younger stroke patients (<= 57 years old) were biologically older than controls (OR=1.19; 95%Cl 1.00-1.41, p-value=0.046). The older groups showed no biological age differences between cases and controls, but were close to reaching the significance level. Ischemic stroke patients are biologically older than controls. Biological age should be considered as a potential new biomarker of stroke risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据