4.5 Article

Economic and Environmental Analysis for Corn Stover and Switchgrass Supply Logistics

期刊

BIOENERGY RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 1433-1448

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12155-015-9609-y

关键词

Corn stover; Switchgrass; Logistics; Cost; Energy consumption; GHGemissions

资金

  1. North Central Regional Sun Grant Center-US Department of Transportation Biobased Transportation Research Program [DOTS59-07-G-00054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supply logistics systems for corn (Zea mays L.) stover and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) with two collection methods, round bales and rectangular bales, are developed. A location in the US Midwest is assumed with corn grown on highly productive crop land and switchgrass grown on less productive land. Bales (15 % moisture wet basis) are stored at local storage sites within 3.2 km (2 mi) of the field at harvest time. Biomass is transported to an end user within a 48 km (30 mi) throughout the year. Round bales are converted to bulk product [bulk density of 240 kg m(-3) (15 lb ft(-3))] by tub grinding followed by roll-press compacting before truck transport. Rectangular bales are delivered by truck without processing. Total delivered cost is $97.70 Mg-1 ($88.63 ton(-1)) for corn stover and $137.87 Mg-1 ($125.07 ton(-1)) for switchgrass when delivered as a bulk compacted product. Total delivered cost is $90.25 Mg-1 ($81.87 ton(-1)) for corn stover and $128.67 Mg-1 ($116.73 ton(-1)) for switchgrass when delivered as rectangular bales. Life-cycle fossil energy consumption is higher for delivering switchgrass (9.9 to 13.8 % of energy in dry matter) than for corn stover (5.8 to 9.5 % of energy in dry matter). Excluding any potential change in soil organic carbon (SOC), life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are 59.2 to 99.8 kg CO(2)e Mg-1 for delivering corn stover and 231.8 to 279.6 kg CO(2)e Mg-1 for delivering switchgrass. The effect of change in SOC on the life-cycle GHG emissions for corn stover and switchgrass is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据