4.7 Article

Age-related changes in miR-143-3p:Igfbp5 interactions affect muscle regeneration

期刊

AGING CELL
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 361-369

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acel.12442

关键词

aging; microRNA; muscle; regeneration; sarcopenia; senescence

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/L021668/1]
  2. MRC
  3. Arthritis Research UK as part of the MRC - Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)
  4. Wellcome Trust [097826/Z/11/A]
  5. BBSRC [BB/L021668/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L021668/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MR/K006312/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A common characteristic of aging is defective regeneration of skeletal muscle. The molecular pathways underlying age-related decline in muscle regenerative potential remain elusive. microRNAs are novel gene regulators controlling development and homeostasis and the regeneration of most tissues, including skeletal muscle. Here, we use satellite cells and primary myoblasts from mice and humans and an invitro regeneration model, to show that disrupted expression of microRNA-143-3p and its target gene, Igfbp5, plays an important role in muscle regeneration invitro. We identified miR-143 as a regulator of the insulin growth factor-binding protein 5 (Igfbp5) in primary myoblasts and show that the expression of miR-143 and its target gene is disrupted in satellite cells from old mice. Moreover, we show that downregulation of miR-143 during aging may act as a compensatory mechanism aiming at improving myogenesis efficiency; however, concomitant upregulation of miR-143 target gene, Igfbp5, is associated with increased cell senescence, thus affecting myogenesis. Our data demonstrate that dysregulation of miR-143-3p:Igfbp5 interactions in satellite cells with age may be responsible for age-related changes in satellite cell function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据