4.7 Review

Diabetes mellitus and risk of falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 761-767

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afw140

关键词

diabetes mellitus; risk factors; falls; meta-analysis; older people; systematic review

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81070254, 30872527, 30672048]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: intensive or very loose glycemic control may contribute to the risk of falls in diabetic patients. However, studies on diabetes mellitus and the risk of falls have yielded conflicting results. Our objective was to investigate the effect of diabetes mellitus on the risk of falls in older adults by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: the PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant studies published until November 2015. Only prospective cohort studies reporting at least age-adjusted risk estimate of falls compared diabetic to non-diabetic individuals were selected. Diabetes mellitus was ascertained by a combination of medical history and laboratory tests or use of antidiabetic drugs. Results: a total of six studies involving 14,685 participants were identified. The number of falls in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals was 423 of 1,692 (25.0%) and 2,368 of 13,011 (18.2%), respectively. Diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of falls (risk ratio [RR] = 1.64; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.27-2.11) in a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses showed that the risk of falls seemed more pronounced among both gender groups (RR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.19-2.76) than among women (RR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.04-2.21). Diabetes increased 94% (RR = 1.94; 95% CI 1.42-2.63) and 27% (RR = 1.27; 95% CI 1.06-1.52) risk of falls in insulin-treated and no-insulin-treated patients, respectively. Conclusions: this meta-analysis reveals that older adults with diabetes mellitus are associated with greater risk of falls, and this association is more pronounced in insulin-treated patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据