4.7 Article

Validation of the FNIH sarcopenia criteria and SOF frailty index as predictors of long-term mortality in ambulatory older men

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 45, 期 5, 页码 603-609

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afw071

关键词

ambulatory older men; mortality; FNIH sarcopenia; SOF frailty

资金

  1. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (FWO
  2. Research Foundation-Flanders) [G0662.07, G0867.11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: we aimed to evaluate the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) criteria for weakness and low muscle mass and the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) frailty index for prediction of long-term, all-cause mortality. Design: community-based cohort study Setting: semi-rural community of Merelbeke (Belgium). Subjects: ambulatory men aged 74 and more (n = 191). Methods: weakness was defined on previously established criteria as low grip strength (<26 kg) or low grip strength-to-body mass index (BMI) ratio (<1.00). Low muscle mass (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) was categorised as low appendicular lean mass (ALM; predefined <19.75 kg) or low ALM-to-BMI ratio (predefined <0.789). Frailty status was assessed using the components of weight loss, inability to rise from a chair and poor energy (SOF index). Survival time was calculated as the number of months from assessment in 2000 until death or up to 15 years of follow-up. Results: mean age of the participants was 78.4 +/- 3.5 years. Combined weakness and low muscle mass was present in 3-8% of men, depending on the criteria applied. Pre-frailty and frailty were present in 30 and 7% of men, respectively. After 15 years of follow-up, 165 men (860) died. Both the presence of combined weakness and low ALM-to-BMI ratio (age-adjusted HR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.30-4.79) and the presence of SOF frailty (age-adjusted HR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.44-4.86) were associated with mortality. Conclusions: our findings confirm the predictive value for mortality of the non-distribution-based FNIH criteria and SOF index in older community-dwelling Belgian men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据