4.7 Article

Greater skeletal muscle fat infiltration is associated with higher all-cause mortality among men of African ancestry

期刊

AGE AND AGEING
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 529-534

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afw062

关键词

obesity; myosteatosis; all-cause mortality; African American; older people

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [R01-AR049747]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01-DK097084, K01-DK083029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: fat infiltration within and around skeletal muscle (i.e. myosteatosis) increases with ageing, is greater in African versus European ancestry men and is associated with poor health. Myosteatosis studies of mortality are lacking, particularly among African ancestry populations. Methods: in the Tobago Health study, a prospective longitudinal study, we evaluated the association of all-cause mortality with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measured lower leg myosteatosis (intermuscular fat (IM fat) and muscle density) in 1,652 African ancestry men using Cox proportional hazards models. Date of death was abstracted from death certificates and/or proxy. Results: one hundred and twelve deaths occurred during follow-up (mean 5.9 years). In all men (age range 40-91 years), higher all-cause mortality was associated with greater IM fat (HR (95% CI) per SD: 1.29 (1.06-1.57)) and lower muscle density (HR (95% CI) per SD lower: 1.37 (1.08-1.75)) in fully adjusted models. Similar mortality hazard rates were seen in the subset of elderly men (aged a parts per thousand yen65 years) with greater IM fat (1.40 (1.11-1.78) or lower muscle density (1.66 (1.24-2.21)) in fully adjusted models. Conclusions: our study identified a novel, independent association between myosteatosis and all-cause mortality in African ancestry men. Further studies are needed to establish whether this association is independent of other ectopic fat depots and to identify possible biological mechanisms underlying this relationship.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据