4.7 Article

Graphitized carbon nanofiber-Pt nanoparticle hybrids as sensitive tool for preparation of screen printing biosensors. Detection of lactate in wines and ciders

期刊

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 58-65

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.07.005

关键词

PtNps; GCNF; Lactate biosensor; Screen printing electrodes; Beverages

资金

  1. ENIAC JOINT UNDERTAKING-Nanoelectronics for Mobile Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Systems Project [12 02 28]
  2. DGI of MICINN (Torres Quevedo Program) [PTQ-11-04404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work describes the fabrication of a new lactate biosensor. The strategy is based on the use of a novel hybrid nanomaterial for amperometric biosensors i.e. platinum nanoparticles (PtNps) supported on graphitized carbon nanofibers (PtNps/GCNF) prepared by chemical reduction of the Pt precursor at GCNF surfaces. The biosensors were constructed by covalent immobilization of lactate oxidase (LOx) onto screen printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) modified with PtNps (PtNps/GCNF-SPCEs) using polyethyleneimine (PEI) and glutaraldehyde (GA). Experimental variables concerning both the biosensor design and the detection process were investigated for an optimal analytical performance. Lactate biosensors show good reproducibility (RSD 4.9%, n = 10) and sensitivity (41,302 +/- 546) mu A/M cm(2), with a good limit of detection (6.9 mu M). Covalent immobilization of the enzyme allows the reuse of the biosensor for several measurements, converting them in a cheap alternative to the solid electrodes. The long-term stability of the biosensors was also evaluated. 90% of the signal was kept after 3 months of storage at room temperature (RT), while 95% was retained after 18 months at -20 degrees C. These results demonstrate that the method provides sensitive electrochemical lactate biosensors where the stability of the enzymatic activity can be preserved for a long period of time in adequate storage conditions. (C) 2014 Elsevier BY. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据