4.4 Article

A newsvendor model with autocorrelated demand under a time-consistent dynamic CVaR measure

期刊

IISE TRANSACTIONS
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 653-671

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2018.1539888

关键词

Newsvendor; autocorrelated demand; risk aversion; conditional value at risk; time consistency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71801207, 71520107002, 71771201]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612100]
  3. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1608085QG162]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a result of autocorrelation, static risk measures such as value at risk and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) are time inconsistent and can thus result in inconsistent decisions over time. In this article, we present a time-consistent dynamic CVaR measure and examine it in the context of a newsvendor problem with autocorrelated demand. Due to the concavity of our CVaR measure, the dynamic program formulation associated with our dynamic newsvendor problem is not immediately separable. However, by exploring certain properties of the dynamic CVaR measure and underlying profit function, our dynamic program can be transformed into a sequence of (single-period) risk-averse newsvendor problems that depend on the observed demand history. By examining the structure of the optimal order quantities, we find both intuitive and counterintuitive results. When demands are positively correlated, the optimal order quantity is monotonically increasing in the degree of risk aversion. However, when demands are negatively correlated and the underlying cost structure satisfies certain conditions, the optimal order quantity is no longer monotonically increasing in the degree of risk aversion. Instead, the optimal order quantity is a decreasing (increasing) function of the degree of risk aversion when it is below (above) a certain threshold. We also show that these results continue to hold when demands follow a general ARMA process, and when inventory carryover is considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据