4.0 Article

Development of an organotypic stem cell model for the study of human embryonic palatal fusion

期刊

BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH
卷 110, 期 17, 页码 1322-1334

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1394

关键词

cleft palate; fusion; human stem cells; organotypic models; spheroid

资金

  1. Intramural EPA [EPA999999] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundMethodsCleft palate (CP) is a common birth defect, occurring in an estimated 1 in 1,000 births worldwide. The secondary palate is formed by paired palatal shelves, consisting of a mesenchymal core with an outer layer of epithelial cells that grow toward each other, attach, and fuse. One of the mechanisms that can cause CP is failure of fusion, that is, failure to remove the epithelial seam between the palatal shelves to allow the mesenchyme confluence. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) plays an important role in palate growth and differentiation, while it may impede fusion. We developed a 3D organotypic model using human mesenchymal and epithelial stem cells to mimic human embryonic palatal shelves, and tested the effects of human EGF (hEGF) on proliferation and fusion. Spheroids were generated from human umbilical-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) directed down an osteogenic lineage. Heterotypic spheroids, or organoids, were constructed by coating hMSC spheroids with extracellular matrix solution followed by a layer of human progenitor epithelial keratinocytes (hPEKs). Organoids were incubated in co-culture medium with or without hEGF and assessed for cell proliferation and time to fusion. ResultsConclusionOsteogenic differentiation in hMSC spheroids was highest by Day 13. hEGF delayed fusion of organoids after 12 and 18hr of contact. hEGF increased proliferation in organoids at 4 ng/ml, and proliferation was detected in hPEKs alone. Our results show that this model of human palatal fusion appropriately mimics the morphology of the developing human palate and responds to hEGF as expected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据