4.0 Review

Impact of chloroform exposures on reproductive and developmental outcomes: A systematic review of the scientific literature

期刊

BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH
卷 110, 期 17, 页码 1267-1313

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1382

关键词

birth defects; chloroform; developmental toxicity; epidemiology; teratogenicity

资金

  1. American Chemistry Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsResults and DiscussionWe assessed the animal and epidemiological data to determine if chloroform exposure causes developmental and/or reproductive toxicity. Initial scoping identified developmental toxicity as the primary area of concern. At levels producing maternal toxicity in rats and mice, chloroform caused decrements in fetal weights and associated delays in ossification. In a single mouse inhalation study, exposure to a high concentration of chloroform was associated with small fetuses and increased cleft palate. However, oral exposure of mice to chloroform at a dose 4 times higher was negative for cleft palate; multiple inhalation studies in rats were also negative. Epidemiologic data on low birth weight and small for gestational age were generally equivocal, preventing conclusions from being drawn for humans. The animal data also show evidence of very early (peri-implantation) total litter losses at very high exposure levels. This effect is likely maternally mediated rather than a direct effect on the offspring. Finally, the epidemiologic data indicate a possible association of higher chloroform exposure with lower risk of preterm birth (<37weeks gestation). ConclusionsThe available animal data suggest that exposures lower than those causing maternal toxicity should be without developmental effects in the offspring. Also, most studies in humans rely on group-level geographic exposure data, providing only weak epidemiologic evidence for an association with development outcomes and fail to establish a causal role for chloroform in the induction of adverse developmental outcomes at environmentally relevant concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据