4.8 Article

Efficient and Stable Bifunctional Electrocatalysts Ni/NixMy (M = P, S) for Overall Water Splitting

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 19, 页码 3314-3323

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201505626

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21306030, 21576056, 21576057, 21576202]
  2. Natural Science Foundations of Guangdong Province [2014A030313520, 2015A030313503]
  3. Program Foundation of the second batch of innovation teams of Guangzhou Bureau of Education [13C04]
  4. Scientific Research Project of Guangzhou Municipal Colleges and Universities [1201410618]
  5. National Abroad Studying Foundation of China
  6. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP130104459, DP140104062, DP160104866]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of easy-to-make, highly active, and stable bifunctional electrocatalysts for water splitting is important for future renewable energy systems. Three-dimension (3D) porous Ni/Ni8P3 and Ni/Ni9S8 electrodes are prepared by sequential treatment of commercial Ni-foam with acid activation, followed by phosphorization or sulfurization. The resultant materials can act as self-supported bifunctional electrocatalytic electrodes for direct water splitting with excellent activity toward oxygen evolution reaction and hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline media. Stable performance can be maintained for at least 24 h, illustrating their versatile and practical nature for clean energy generation. Furthermore, an advanced water electrolyzer through exploiting Ni/Ni8P3 as both anode and cathode is fabricated, which requires a cell voltage of 1.61 V to deliver a 10 mA cm(-2) water splitting current density in 1.0 M KOH solution. This performance is significantly better than that of the noble metal benchmark-integrated Ni/IrO2 and Ni/Pt-C electrodes. Therefore, these bifunctional electrodes have significant potential for realistic large-scale production of hydrogen as a replacement clean fuel to polluting and limited fossil-fuels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据