4.5 Article

Effects of Exogenous 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and 24-Epibrassinolide on Cd Accumulation in Rice from Cd-Contaminated Soil

期刊

RICE SCIENCE
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 320-329

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2018.10.002

关键词

rice; C d-contaminated soil; 5-aminolevulinic acid; 24-epibrassinolide; C d accumulation

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [LY17C020005]
  2. Key Research and Development Project of Zhejiang Province, China [2015C03020-4]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31401356]
  4. Jinhua Science and Technology Project [2015-2-012]
  5. National Training Program for College Students to Innovate and Start Enterprise [201710356013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High grain-C d-accumulating rice variety Yongyou 9 was planted in C d-contaminated farmland in Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province, China to study the effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and 24-epibrassinolide (EBR) on C d accumulation in brown rice. Results showed that the exogenous ALA and EBR had no significant effects on agronomic traits, soil pH and total C d content in soil, but had some effects on the available C d content in soil, and significantly influenced the C d accumulation in the different parts of rice. Results also showed that 100 mg/L exogenous ALA significantly reduced the C d accumulation in brown rice to blow the food safety standard (0.2 mg/kg), and also significantly reduced the C d contents in the roots and culm of rice. However, 200 mg/L exogenous ALA treatment increased the C d content in brown rice remarkably. In addition, 0.15 mg/L EBR treatment increased C d accumulation in roots, culm, leaves and brown rice notably, whereas 0.30 mg/L exogenous EBR treatment reduced the C d accumulation in brown rice properly, but it was not significant Therefore, proper concentration of ALA can effectively reduce the C d accumulation in brown rice, which can be used as an effective technical method for the safe production of rice in C d polluted farmland.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据