4.8 Article

Controlled Mechanical Buckling for Origami-Inspired Construction of 3D Microstructures in Advanced Materials

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 16, 页码 2629-2639

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201504901

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-07ER46471]
  2. NSF [CMMI-1400169, DMR-1121262]
  3. NIH [R01EB019337]
  4. Thousand Young Talents Program of China
  5. National Science Foundation of China [11502129]
  6. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1400169] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Origami is a topic of rapidly growing interest in both the scientific and engineering research communities due to its promising potential in a broad range of applications. Previous assembly approaches for origami structures at the micro/nanoscale are constrained by the applicable classes of materials, topologies, and/or capability for reversible control over the transformation process. Here, a strategy is introduced that exploits mechanical buckling for autonomic origami assembly of 3D structures across material classes from soft polymers to brittle inorganic semiconductors, and length scales from nanometers to centimeters. This approach relies on a spatial variation of thickness in the initial 2D structures as a means to produce engineered folding creases during the compressive buckling process. The elastic nature of the assembly scheme enables active, deterministic control over intermediate states in the 2D to 3D transformation in a continuous and reversible manner. Demonstrations include a broad set of 3D structures formed through unidirectional, bidirectional, and even hierarchical folding, with examples ranging from half cylindrical columns and fish scales, to cubic boxes, pyramids, starfish, paper fans, skew tooth structures, and to amusing system-level examples of soccer balls, model houses, cars, and multifloor textured buildings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据