4.4 Article

Lack of effects of glyphosate and glufosinate on growth, mineral content, and yield of glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant maize

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2018.1511204

关键词

Glufosinate; glyphosate; herbicide resistance; maize; plant mineral nutrition

资金

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [444281/2014-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whether herbicides used in transgenic, herbicide-resistant crops have negative effects on those crops has been controversial. Most all of the data on this topic has been on glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean, with little information available on GR and glufosinate-resistant (GluR) maize. A GR plus GluR maize variety was evaluated in the greenhouse and the field for effects of glyphosate and glufosinate on growth, mineral content, and yield. Treatments were: 1) a herbicide-free control; 2) 980 g acid equivalent (a.e.) ha(-1) glyphosate at 21 days after emergence (DAE); 3) 600 g active ingredient (a.i.) ha(-1) glufosinate at 21 DAE; 4) sequential applications of glyphosate at 520 and 980 g a.e. ha(-1) at 14 and 28 DAE, respectively; 5) sequential applications of glufosinate at 300 and 300 g a.i. ha(-1) at 14 and 28 DAE, respectively; and 6) sequential application of glyphosate (980 g a.e. ha(-1)) and glufosinate (600 g a.i. ha(-1)) at 14 and 28 DAE, respectively. None of the herbicide treatments affected plant growth, yield, or content of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Mn, Fe, Cu, or Zn in the greenhouse or field. In grain of field-grown plants, no glufosinate was found and glyphosate (0.12 ng g(-1)) was only found in the sequential glyphosate treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据