4.8 Article

Urchin-Like CoSe2 as a High-Performance Anode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 37, 页码 6728-6735

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201602608

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Korean government [20152020105420]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [NRF-2015R1A2A1A15055227]
  3. Chinese MOE [B12015]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20152020105420] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urchin-like CoSe2 assembled by nanorods has been synthesized via simple solvothermal route and has been first applied as an anode material for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) with ether-based electrolytes. The CoSe2 delivers excellent sodiation and desodiation properties when using 1 M NaCF3SO3 in diethyleneglycol dimethylether as an electrolyte and cycling between 0.5 and 3.0 V. A high discharge capacity of 0.410 Ah g(-1) is obtained at 1 A g(-1) after 1800 cycles, corresponding to a capacity retention of 98.6% calculated from the 30th cycle. Even at an ultrahigh rate of 50 A g(-1), the capacity still maintains 0.097 Ah g(-1). The reaction mechanism of the as-prepared CoSe2 is also investigated. The results demonstrate that at discharged 1.56 V, insertion reaction occurs, while two conversion reactions take place at the second and third plateaus around 0.98 and 0.65 V. During the charge process, Co first reacts with Na2Se to form NaxCoSe2 and then turns back to CoSe2. In addition to Na/CoSe2 half cells, Na3V2(PO4)(3)/CoSe2 full cell with excessive amount of Na3V2(PO4)(3) has been studied. The full cell exhibits a reversible capacity of 0.380 Ah g(-1). This work definitely enriches the possibilities for anode materials for SIBs with high performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据