4.8 Article

Ultra-Thin Layered Ternary Single Crystals [Sn(SxSe1-x)2] with Bandgap Engineering for High Performance Phototransistors on Versatile Substrates

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 21, 页码 3630-3638

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201600081

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council
  2. Ministry of Education of the Republic of China
  3. Taiwan International Graduate Program (TIGP), Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2D ternary semiconductor single crystals, an emerging class of new materials, have attracted significant interest recently owing to their great potential for academic interest and practical application. In addition to other types of metal dichalcogenides, 2D tin dichalcogenides are also important layered compounds with similar capabilities. Yet, multi-elemental single crystals enable to assist multiple degrees of freedom for dominant physical properties via ratio alteration. This study reports the growth of single crystals Se-doped SnS2 or SnSSe alloys, and demonstrates their capability for the fabrication of phototransistors with high performance. Based on exfoliation from bulk high quality single crystals, this study establishes the characteristics of few-layered SnSSe in structural, optical, and electrical properties. Moreover, few-layered SnSSe phototransistors are fabricated on both rigid (SiO2/Si) and versatile polyethylene terephthalate substrates and their optoelectronic properties are examined. SnSSe as a phototransistor is demonstrated to exhibit a high photoresponsivity of about 6000 A W-1 with ultra-high photogain (eta) approximate to 8.8 x 10(5), fast response time approximate to 9 ms, and specific detectivity (D-star) approximate to 8.2 x 10(12) J. These unique features are much higher than those of recently published phototransistors configured with other few-layered 2D single crystals, making ultrathin SnSSe a highly qualified candidate for next-generation optoelectronic applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据