4.5 Article

Understanding the stability of DNA G-quadruplex units in long human telomeric strands

期刊

BIOCHIMIE
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 125-133

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.04.003

关键词

G-quadruplexes; Contiguous G4; Tandem G4; Stability; Telomeres

资金

  1. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN)
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human telomeric DNA is composed of GGGTTA repeats. The presence of consecutive guanines makes the telomeric G-strand prone to fold into contiguous (or tandem) G-quadruplexes (G4s). The aim of this study was to provide a clarified picture of the stability of telomeric tandem G4 structures as a function of the number of G4 units and of boundary sequences, and an understanding of the diversity of their melting behaviors in terms of the single G4 units composing them. To this purpose we undertook an UV-spectroscopic investigation of the structure and stability of telomeric repeats potentially able to fold into up to four contiguous G4s, flanked or not by TTA sequences at their 5' and 3' extremities. We explain why the stability of (GGGTTA)(4m-1)GGG structures (m = 2, 3, 4...) decreases with increasing the number in of G4 units, whereas the stability of TTA-(GGGTTA)4(m-1)GGG-TTA structures does not. Our results support that the inner G4 units have similar stabilities, whereas the stabilities of the terminal G4 units are modulated by their flanking nucleotides: in a TTA-(GGGITA)(4m-1)GGG-TTA tandem context, the terminal G4 units are roughly as stable as the inner G4 units; while in a (GGGTTA)(4m-1)GGG tandem context, the G4 at the 5' extremity is more stable than the G4 at the 3' extremity, which in turn is more stable than an inner G4. Our study provides new information about the global and local stability of telomeric tandem G4 structures under near physiological conditions. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据