4.7 Article

Streaming Current Based Microtubular Enzymatic Sensor for Self-Powered Detection of Urea

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admt.201800430

关键词

microtube; urea biosensor; urease immobilization; urine; zeta potential

资金

  1. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore, under its Research Centre of Excellence, Mechanobiology Institute
  2. Hybrid Integrated Flexible Electronic Systems (HiFES) Initiative
  3. MechanoBioEngineering Laboratory at the Department of Biomedical Engineering of the National University of Singapore
  4. Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of microfluidic techniques coupled with flow-induced electrification has advanced the development of innovative self-powered sensors. However, selective detection of target substances using these sensors is extremely challenging, owing to the lack of recognition elements in the flow pathway. To overcome this, catalytic enzymes are immobilized on the microfluidic channel and the concentration of targets is measured via monitoring the streaming current. As an example, a urease equipped self-powered microtubular sensor is developed to selectively detect urea, a physiologically and industrially important molecule. The urease catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea into ions, increasing the pH of the fluid, which serves as the basis of the sensing mechanism. Remarkably, high sensitivity, wide detection range, short response time, and superior selectivity are reported for urinary urea detection. The accuracy and reliability of sensing in artificial urine are validated with the standard spectrophotometric method. The microtubular sensor features facile fabrication and operation and circumvents the need for sophisticated peripherals, highlighting its enormous potential in chemical and biomedical applications, such as pollutant detection, food quality assessment, disease diagnosis, and point-of-care testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据